(页数:13 字数:8110 毕业论文)摘 要:自由心证与自由裁量权是近年来我国诉讼法学界讨论的热点问题,但关于两者对比研究的文章很少。本文从两者的关系角度出发,从五个方面对两者进行论述,首先论述了自由心证和法官自由裁量权的渊源和内涵;其次论述了两者在我国的现状:再次对比分析了两者之间的区别与联系;列举了两者在司法实践中出现的问题;最后在总结两者的联系的基础上提出解决问题的方法。本文认为解决了法官自由裁量权滥用的问题也就解决了自由心证的问题。 Free evaluation of evidence and discretionary power Abstract :In recent years, free evaluation of evidence and the discretion power have been discussed in field of China's civil procedure. But scholars rarely discuss the connection between free evaluation of evidence and the discretion power. The paper contain five parts, first it elaborates on free evaluation of evidence and the discretion power . secondly it talk about the current situation of them in china. Thirdly it talk about the connection of them by contrasting qualities and so on . fourthly it enumerate the defect of them .the last part of the paper advance the point of view that base on the connection .If the problem of discretionary power is solved , the problem of free evaluation of evidence will be solved too. Key words: free evaluation of the evidence; discretionary power; professional ethics 目 录 前 言 |
论自由心证与法官自由裁量权
- 上一篇:我国司法解释规则的新发展及其再完善
- 下一篇:证人出庭难的原因及对策思考
查看评论
已有0位网友发表了看法